Any day now, the European commission is expected to announce whether it will formally object to what some see as Google’s abuse of its power in the way that it treats smaller sites that offer the same sorts of services as it does.
If that happens, Google could be forced to comply with strictures on the way it treats rival sites offering particular sorts of search – for news, products, maps, shopping, images or videos – rather than pushing its own on the site.
Alternatively, it could face fines of millions of pounds.
On another note the same articles reports about a possible way to escape the Panda by moving blocks of content that have been "pandalized" to new domains.
While on the topic of Panda, a WebmasterWorld member (Content_ed) has an interesting story up about moving his good content from a Panda hit site to a site that was actually boosted by Panda.
“I moved a half dozen pages that were drawing a few hundred visitors a day from Google on my Pandalized (down 80%) site to my Panda pleased (up over 300%) site this weekend,” he says.
...Of the half dozen pages, three were slightly above their pre-Panda level (year-over-year) on Monday, and three were around 20% under...
It’s something to consider, given HubPages’ strategy of subdomaining to separate out the better stuff...
WebmasterWorld moderator Tedster had the following response to Content_ed’s post: “A lot may depend on the number of pages that each site contains.
If you moved half a dozen pages to a domain that contains hundreds or thousands of other pages, you may see no changes with future Panda iterations.
There’s also a chance, since Panda has a site-wide influence, that these pages were not the source of the Panda problem on their original domain. In which case, you made an excellent move.”
Read the full article: http://www.webpronews.com/google-panda-update-antitrust-connections-being-tossed-around-2011-12
Your new post is loading...